3.

MACH NUMBER AND HIGH VELOCITY FLOW EFFECTS

–   page 3.3   –
–   page 3.4   –
–   page 3.7   –
 Problem 896: Calculation of loss in normal shock wave formed in Laval nozzle  Problem 862: Calculation of position of shock wave in nozzle, see art. 4.
–   page 3.9   –
 Problem 1007: Calculation of oblique shock wave parameters
–   page 3.10   –
–   page 3.12   –
–   page 3.13   –
–   page 3.14   –
–   page 3.17   –
–   page 3.18   –
– page 3.19–3.28 –
page 3.2
– author: –
ŠKORPÍK, Jiří (LinkedIn.com/in/jiri-skorpik)
–    issue date:    –
January 2006, February 2023, February 2026 (3rd ed.)
– title: –
Mach number and high velocity flow effects
– web: –
– provenance: –
Brno (Czech Republic)
– email: –
skorpik.jiri@email.cz

Copyright©Jiří Škorpík, 2006-2026
All rights reserved.

MACH NUMBER AND HIGH VELOCITY FLOW EFFECTS
page 3.3

Basic concepts in high velocity flow

When fluids flow at speeds V significantly lower than the speed of sound a, we expect, as observers, a certain behavior of this fluid when it flows around bodies. A typical manifestation of subsonic flow is a smooth change in the flow trajectories already in front of the body being flowed around, as in Figure 520. This behavior is due to sound as a pressure disturbance propagating in a continuum from the source-S of pressure disturbance, which is the surface of the bodies. This means that in supersonic flow it is impossible for changes in pressure and other state quantities to propagate against the direction of flow. For this reason, we observe fundamental differences between the propagation of a pressure disturbance in a subsonic, sonic or supersonic flow in channels or when flowing around bodies and the formation of special phenomena (shock and expansion waves) that do not arise at subsonic speeds. The ratio of V to a is called the Mach number.

– 520: –
Subsonic flow around
Nature of subsonic flow
S-source of pressure disturbance.
Mach number
Mach number is defined as the ratio of the velocity of a fluid V to the speed of sound in a fluid a, see Equation 337. The speed of sound a is a function of the fluid composition and temperature.
– 337: –
Definition of Mach number and speed of sound
a [m·s-1] speed of sound in continuum under investigation; M [Mach] Mach number; p [Pa] pressure; r [J·kg-1·K-1] specific gas constant; T [K] absolute gas temperature (static temperature); V [m·s-1] velocity of body or flow; ρ [kg·m-3] density; κ [1] heat capacity ratio. The derivation of the equation for the speed of sound is shown in Appendix 337.
Critical Mach number
The value of the Mach number in the investigated volume can vary, as the velocities of the fluid and sound change locally. For example, the fluid flowing around the airfoil in Figure 520 has a different velocity in front of the airfoil and a different velocity around the airfoil. This means that the Mach numbers at the inlet of the fluid into the investigated volume may be different from those at some points in the investigated volume. If we define a reference point at the inlet of the investigated volume at which we determine the Mach number, we can also determine the critical value of the Mach number at this point at which the fluid reaches the speed of sound somewhere inside the investigated volume, or M=1. The critical Mach number is less than 1 (M<1) if the velocity increases in the investigated volume, and greater than 1 (M>1) if the velocity decreases in the investigated area (for example, in diffusers).
MACH NUMBER AND HIGH VELOCITY FLOW EFFECTS
page 3.4

Effects of finite magnitude of speed of sound on stream continuity

Using sound as a pressure disturbance, information about the size of bodies in the investigated volume is propagated through the continuum. This allows, in subsonic flow, the streamlines to react to the flowed around bodies with an advance as in Figure 520, p. 3.3. On the contrary, in supersonic mutual motion of the fluid and the body, such an advance cannot occur and this body is forced to displace the surrounding fluid with its volume by a stepwise compression and thus change its direction through a effect called shock wave. The consequence of the finite size of the speed of sound is also a "mirror" change in properties of the channel flows when the speed of sound is exceeded.

  ~  
Subsonic flow around bodies
In a homogeneous environment, the pressure disturbance propagates from its source-S in spherical surfaces, i.e. at the same velocity in all directions. The pressure difference at the boundary of the intact medium and the sound wave decreases with increasing radius of the sound wave (decreasing its energy density or sound intensity), thus also decreasing the influence of the sound wave on the surrounding medium. As the pressure disturbance source moves in the direction of the pressure disturbance source, the sound intensity gradient increases and vice versa, see Figure 772.
– 772: –
Propagation of sound waves when pressure disturbance source moves
Propagation of sound waves when pressure disturbance source moves
τ [s] time. The circles 0, 1, 2, 3 represent the boundary of sound waves in the environment at time τ=0...3. At time 0 the source is just at coordinate 0 at time 1 at coordinate 1 etc. This means that at point 0 the source will cause a pressure disturbance that propagates at the speed of sound in the spherical plane, after the source travels the distance 0-S it will have the radius of the sound wave indicated by the symbol 0 in the figure. The same procedure applies to the pressure disturbance induced by the source at point 1, etc.
MACH NUMBER AND HIGH VELOCITY FLOW EFFECTS
page 3.5
Supersonic flow around bodies
In the case of supersonic speed (M≥1) the streamlines to not gradually rise in front of the flowed around body and the body is forced by its volume to displace the surrounding gas by abrupt compression - the energy to compress the gas is taken from the motion of the body. The gas thus compressed gradually expands away from the body. The boundary between the compressed gas and the surrounding gas is cone-shaped and is called a shock wave (Figure 339). The slope of the shock wave βSW is always greater than the Mach angle μ - their equality would occur for the case of an infinite body.
– 339: –
Relationship between shock wave angle and Mach angle
(a) source is moving at supersonic speed; (b) streamlines around oblique shock wave (compare with Figure 520, p. 3.3); (c) source is moving at speed of sound. SW-shock wave. βSW [°] shock wave angle (μ<βSW); μ [°] Mach angle. The figure does not deal with the situation of the shock waves at the time before τ=0, nor with the situation behind the shock wave and behind the body; this problem is discussed in the next section of the paper.
Sonic flow around bodies
In the case of sonic speeds (M=1), the pressure disturbance front is always at the source. The Mach angle μ is 90°, therefore the shock wave angle βSW in front of the real body must be greater than 90°, see Figure 339c.
Principle of relativity of flow around flowing bodies
So far the propagation of sound waves or the generation of shock waves when the body is moving has been shown, but the same effect is achieved in the reverse case when the body is at rest and the gas is flowing.
  ~  
Shock wave
Compared to a sound wave, the shock wave is a permanent abrupt change in state variables (higher pressure, temperature, and density behind it). This situation resembles an expanding ball of compressed gas, with more gas added due to body movement. However, the cone's volume increases with the third power of time, while the amount of compressed gas grows linearly (at constant velocity). Thus, shock wave intensity decreases with distance from the tip of the shock cone.
MACH NUMBER AND HIGH VELOCITY FLOW EFFECTS
page 3.6
  ~  
Changing flow properties in channels at high speeds
The equation that predicts the formation of shock waves at high flow speeds in channels was published in 1886 by the French inventor, mathematician and physicist Pierre Henri Hugoniot (1851-1887). He developed it while studying flow at the mouth of gun barrels (see Equation 518).
– 518: –
Hugoniot's theorem
Hugoniot's theorem (Area-Mach number relation)
A [m] flow area. This equation is referred to as Hugoniot's theorem or the Area-Mach number relation. The flow tube can be formed by solid walls or a sharp boundary between two media with very different states or properties (liquid versus gas; rarefied gas versus shock wave at edge, etc.). The derivation of Hugoniot's theorem is given in Appendix 518.
Flow in channel reaches speed of sound only at its narrowest area
According to Hugoniot's theorem, at the subsonic speed at the inlet to the narrowing tube (M<1) there will be an increase in velocity and conversely, so it is also possible to determine the point in the tube where the flow can reach the speed of sound (M=1), it must be at the local extreme dA/A=0. If the decrease in the velocity of the supersonic flow occurs only in the narrowing channel, then the speed of sound can only be achieved at the narrowest point of the channel. If this happens, we say that the flow has reached the critical velocity V* in the channel.
Speed characteristics of flow in channel at subsonic and supersonic inlet speeds
The behavior of the supersonic flow is therefore exactly opposite to that of the subsonic flow, which is why the two identical channels in Figure 868 operate quite differently in the subsonic and supersonic inlet flows. If the subsonic flow (Figure 868a) enters the channel and increases its velocity up to M=1 at the throat, beyond this flow area the velocity increases further to a highly supersonic outlet velocity, then the channel shown behaves like a supersonic nozzle. Conversely, the channel shown behaves like a supersonic diffuser, if a supersonic flow enters the channel, which decreases its velocity to M=1 at the throat, beyond which the velocity further decreases to the low subsonic velocity, thereby transforming the kinetic energy of the supersonic flow into compressive energy.
– 868: –
Examples of effect of inlet velocity on function of variable flow area
(a) supersonic nozzle (Laval nozzle); (b) supersonic diffuser.
MACH NUMBER AND HIGH VELOCITY FLOW EFFECTS
page 3.7
Shock waves in channel flow
Machines in which supsonic speeds can occur can realistically only be designed for specific conditions (it can be shown that the ratio of the outlet flow area to the minimum flow area must also be different for different Mach numbers), changing the conditions would require changing the geometry of the machine to meet the requirements of the flow transition from supersonic to subsonic. This is often not possible to meet and the transition is made in the expanding part of the flow tube by the abrupt change in the state variables, i.e. the shock wave, only in this way can the conditions of Hugoniot's theorem be met ("smooth transition" is not possible in such channel). There are several basic types of shock waves according to the conditions under which they are generated, see the following chapters.

Normal shock wave

In normal shock wave, the velocity decreases almost stepwise (wave thickness is approximately 10-7 m [Hloušek, 1992]) to subsonic without changing direction, as shown in Figure 519. Changes of state quantities in normal shock wave can be calculated using the Rankine-Hugoniot equations. Normal shock waves are generated in channels and around isolated bodies at the speed of sound.

– 519: –
Passage of gas through normal shock wave
Passage of gas by normal shock wave
1-gas state before shock wave; 2-gas state behind shock wave. p [Pa] pressure; V* [m·s-1] critical flow velocity. The derivation of the equations for normal shock wave is carried out, for example, in [Macur, 2010, p. 372].
  ~  
Change of gas state when passing through normal shock wave
The energy balance of normal shock wave was first established with a satisfactory result with satisfactory results in calculating changes in state quantities by the German physicist Ludwig Prandtl (1875-1953) by introducing the assumption that a stepwise change of state quantities in a shock wave also results in an increase in entropy, which can be clearly seen from the h-s diagram of the shock wave in Figure 338, p. 3.8. This also means that the shock wave generates a thermodynamic loss.
MACH NUMBER AND HIGH VELOCITY FLOW EFFECTS
page 3.8
– 338: –
Change of gas state when passing through normal shock wave
h [kJ·kg-1] gas enthalpy; s [J·kg-1·K-1] gas entropy; Lh [J·kg-1] shock wave loss; p* [Pa] critical pressure (pressure when flow hits speed of sound during expansion from point 1s); Vt [m·s-1] theoretical gas velocity during isentropic expansion from pressure p2s to pressure p1; ξ [1] shock wave loss coefficient. Index s denotes total state.
  ~  
Equation for change state quantities for passage of normal shock wave
The shock wave loss depends solely on gas properties and velocity, as evident from Rankine-Hugoniot equations (Equation 333) and Problem 896 calculation. It is independent of the bypassed shape of body.
– 333: –
Rankine-Hugoniot equations
Rankine-Hugoniot equations
The equations are derived for the stable normal shock wave and ideal gas. The derivation of the equations is shown in Appendix 333.
–  Problem 896:  –
A normal shock wave was generated in the Laval nozzle. Calculate the loss as the gas passes through this wave. The measured pressure and temperature in front of and behind the wave are shown in the attached figure. The calculated velocity before the wave from the nozzle cross section and mass flow rate is 583,72 m·s-1. Dry air flows through the nozzle.
The solution of this problem is shown in Appendix 896.
Gas passage through normal shock wave
p [MPa]; t [°C].
MACH NUMBER AND HIGH VELOCITY FLOW EFFECTS
page 3.9

Oblique shock waves

The oblique shock wave is slope relative to the flow direction in front of it by the shock wave angle βSW. In front of the oblique shock wave, velocity must be supersonic, but behind, it can be subsonic or supersonic. As the flow traverses the oblique shock wave, its direction is deflected by angle δ (Figure 107). Normal velocity components (V1n, V2n) share properties with those passing through a normal shock wave (see Problem 1007). The equality of tangential velocity components (V1t=V2t) can be proved (e.g., [Kadrnožka, 2004, p. 126-127]). Oblique shock waves are formed, for example, around surfaces when gases flow at supersonic speeds.

– 107: –
Passage of gas through oblique shock wave
Passage of compressible gas by oblique shock wave
δ [°] velocity deflection post-shock from original direction. The index n denotes the normal velocity components, the index t denotes tangential velocity components.
  ~  
Shock wave angleand its effect on losses
Additionally, analyzing oblique shock wave properties reveals that when βSW equals the Mach angle μ, V1n=a1 must be true, indicating only the sound wave—following the Mach angle definition. It's also demonstrated that the maximum energy loss (entropy increase) happens when βSW=90°, making losses in the oblique shock wave less than in a normal shock wave for the same pressure ratio ahead and behind the wave.
–  Problem 1007:  –
What is the angle of the shock wave formed by a missile at M=2,5 Mach? Find the velocity, temperature and pressure in the stream behind the wave? The geometry of the missile is shown in the figure. The other parameters are: κ=1,4, t1=20 °C, p1=101 325,25 Pa, r=287 J·kg-1·K-1.
The solution of this problem is shown in Appendix 1007.
Flying missile and its shock wave
MACH NUMBER AND HIGH VELOCITY FLOW EFFECTS
page 3.10
  ~  
Formation of oblique shock wave
Oblique shock waves are generated in supersonic flow at the locations of sources of pressure disturbances, for example, edges of profiles, roughness on wrapped surfaces (manufacturing roughness, droplet of incompressible fluid), interface between the supersonic flow and the surrounding fluid (a typical example is the supersonic gas outlet from a Laval nozzle). The oblique shock wave also arises where the flow area of the supersonic flow is stepwise reduced, as shown in Figure 808. In a similar way, the oblique shock wave can also be generated when two supersonic flows meet obliquely, as indicated in Figure 522, p. 3.14. If the surface angle δS is greater than the corresponding shock wave angle δ in Figure 107, p. 3.9, then the shock wave will move before the beginning of the wedge [Dejč, 1967, p. 150]. An interesting situation occurs if the stepwise rising surface is replaced by an arc, see the following chapter.
– 808: –
Formation of oblique shock wave at root of stepwise rising contact surface
Formation of oblique shock wave at root of stepwise rising contact surface
δS [°] angle of contact surface.
Formation of oblique shock waves at droplet boundaries
The flow deflection during the passing of an oblique shock wave is used to purposely change the direction of the supersonic flow to control the thrust vector of solid propellant rocket engines. In this case, the shock wave is created by a droplet of incompressible liquid (e.g. N2O4) injected on the inside of the nozzle.

Unreachable compression waves

The compression wave is an equivalent to the shock wave. It is smooth isentropic compression of supersonic flow in a narrowing space as described by Hugoniot's theorem. In practice, however, this process is not possible because the reduction of the flow area would have to be infinitesimal and the surfaces perfectly smooth [Dejč, 1967, p. 405]. In real supersonic flow, effect called crossed shock wave can be used to split shock wave.

MACH NUMBER AND HIGH VELOCITY FLOW EFFECTS
page 3.11
  ~  
Crossed shock waves
If conditions are created behind an oblique shock wave for the formation of other oblique shock waves, then these other oblique shock waves will have a gradually increasing shock wave angle βSW. This means that these oblique shock waves will cross into one at a certain distance from the flown surface, see Figure 481. The resulting oblique shock wave has the same momentum as the crossed shock waves and also has a smaller angle βSW than the first wave.
– 481: –
Crossed shock waves
(a) crossing of oblique shock waves on a stepped surface; (b) crossing of oblique shock waves on slowly rising surface (here the crossing is similar to compression wave). CW-set of compression waves.
  ~  
Shock wave splitting
In aviation, experiments have been carried out to reduce the sound effects caused by shock waves in supersonic flights based on the splitting of the shock wave into several partial waves, see Figure 905. This maximizes the angle of the resulting shock wave (behind all shock waves from the fuselage have met). This is because the larger the angle of the shock wave (preferably 90°), the smaller the sound effect from the wave [Hošek, 1962, p. 60] - which would allow transport aircraft to fly at high speeds even over populated areas.
– 905: –
Project Quiet Spike
Project Quiet Spike
The project successfully explored the possibility of reducing the intensity of sound effects by using a stepped extension of the nose of aircraft. Here, testing of the telescoping nose of F-15B aircraft. NASA Photo by:Carla Thomas
MACH NUMBER AND HIGH VELOCITY FLOW EFFECTS
page 3.12

λ-shock wave

The λ-shock wave (Figure 865) forms when bodies are flown around at transonic speed (approximately between the critical Mach number and M=1..1,3) with a laminar boundary layer. In this layer, pressure gradually rises at the expense of velocity due to subsonic flow, increasing thickness. This creates a wedge, leading to oblique shock waves crossing, as shown in the simplified diagram (Figure 867). The resulting shock wave is often slightly inclined forward [Hošek, 1949]. In turbulent flow, the wedge is small (turbulent flow is less sensitive to pressure change), generating a directly normal shock wave at the boundary layer interface.

– 865: –
Simplified description of λ-shock wave
(a) overall view of λ-shock wave; (b) pressure change in λ-shock wave and in boundary layer. LBL-laminar boundary layer; i-pressure distribution in core of flow before and behind shock wave; ii-pressure distribution in laminar boundary layer; OSW-oblique shock waves due to increase in thickness of boundary layer. t [m] thickness of the boundary layer; x [m] distance.
Losses in λ-shock wave
Generally, the loss in the λ-shock wave is less than in a normal shock wave and greater than in an oblique shock wave [Hošek, 1949, p. 201]. Therefore, streamlines passing through oblique shock waves (the part closer to the profile) will have a different velocity than those passing through a normal shock wave. In addition to the loss in the shock wave, the loss associated with the flow separation from the profile that occurs behind the λ-shock wave must be added (see Figure 120) [Hošek, 1949, p. 198], [Kadrnožka, 2004, p. 132].
– 867: –
Principle of Boundary layer separation behind λ-shock wave
Boundary layer separation behind λ-shock wave
CFD predictions of flow separation behind a shock wave are presented in the article [Marbona et al., 2026].
MACH NUMBER AND HIGH VELOCITY FLOW EFFECTS
page 3.13

Expansion waves

Increasing flow area also creates obtuse angles on bodies, like the trailing edge of projectiles, the beginning of fuselage taper, in nozzles etc., as seen in Figure 340, illustrating a typical supersonic obtuse angle flow. When wrapping around obtuse angles at supersonic velocity, gas must expand from pressure p1 to p2, flow velocity increases from V1 to V2, and the flow direction is deflected by angle δ from the original. In the expansion wave, there's a gradual change in state variables with very low losses (isentropic expansion).

– 340: –
Supersonic flow near obtuse angle
Supersonic flow near obtuse angle
ML-Mach line; Δ [m] distance traveled by fluid particle at velocity V before the pressure disturbance from source S reaches it.
  ~  
Flow deflection
The formation of the expansion wave in Figure 340 is initiated by a pressure disturbance at the edge S. This disturbance propagates at the speed of sound (so that it cannot propagate against the flow), which propagates with a Mach angle μ1. The ML1 boundary at which flow direction starts to change and the gas starts to expand is so-called Mach line or also the first expansion wave. It is obvious that the slope of this line is equal to the Mach angle μ1. During expansion the Mach number changes and the expansion also changes its character because the Mach angle changes. The expansion stops at the Mach line ML2 where the flowing gas reaches pressure p2. The first and last Mach lines form the Mach wedge in which the gas expansion takes place. The value of the angle δ can be determined from the Prandtl-Meyer function ν [Anon., 2010], see Equation 521.
– 521: –
Prandtl-Meyer function for flow deflection
Prandtl-Meyer function for flow deflection: ν(M) [°] Prandtl-Meyer function
Maximum flow deflection
The maximum angle of deflection of the flow when passing through the expansion wave δmax and the maximum velocity V2max is reached by the flow when expanding into the vacuum p2=0. In vacuum expansion, M2=∞. If the angle of inclination of the edge is greater than δmax a vacuum will be created behind the edge S between the flow and the contact surface.
MACH NUMBER AND HIGH VELOCITY FLOW EFFECTS
page 3.14

Effect of high velocities on airfoil aerodynamics

The difference between subsonic and supersonic flow around airfoils is not only in the velocity distribution but mainly in the changes in values of aerodynamic quantities describing the force effects of the flow on the airfoil.

  ~  
Subsonic and transonic flow around airfoils
The velocity in the around of the airfoil first increases up to the widest its section, then starts to decrease and no effects are observed in the subsonic flow, see Figure 800a. At the critical Mach number, the velocity may reach the speed of sound at some point in the around of the airfoil, causing expansion waves to form behind the widest section of the airfoil, behind which the velocity is higher than in front of them. Behind the trailing edge of the profile, the velocity must be subsonic, i.e. a shock wave is generated in front of the trailing edge of the profile (continuous transition between velocities is not possible). At the same time, it will be a λ-impact wave because the profile is short with a laminar boundary layer, see Figure 800b.
– 800: –
Characteristics of subsonic flow around lenticular airfoil
(a) subsonic flow around airfoil; (b) transonic flow around airfoil, [Kneubuehl, 2004, p. 78]. EF-expansion fan; λW-λ-shock wave.
  ~  
Sound and supersonic flow around airfoils
The λ-shock wave moves with increasing velocity towards the trailing edge of the airfoil. When the flow in front of the airfoil reaches the speed of sound, this wave is generated at the trailing edge and normal shock wave starts to form at the leading edge (Figure 522(a)). At supersonic velocity, the frontal normal shock wave transforms into the oblique shock wave and the same happens at the trailing edge where two oblique shock waves are formed by the collision of two supersonic streams from the suction and pressure sides of the airfoil, see Figure 522(b).
– 522: –
Flow around lenticular airfoil by sound and supersonic flow
(a) sound speed in front of airfoil; (b) supersonic speed in front of airfoil [Kneubuehl, 2004, p. 78].
Supersonic flow around space shuttle
The effects in the above paragraphs are observed as the body moves from take-off to high supersonic speed. Figure 897 displays the Space Shuttle Discovery launch (STS-114, 2005). On the left, the image at 50,87 s after launch (Mach 1.2, aerodynamic drag at max), on the right, at 59,72 s (Mach 1,5, aerodynamic drag decreasing).
MACH NUMBER AND HIGH VELOCITY FLOW EFFECTS
page 3.15
– 897: –
Compressible flow around space shuttle at launch
Photo source [O’Farrell and Rieckhoff, 2011].
  ~  
Airfoils for high velocities
In a well-designed airfoil, the occurrence of high velocity effects and their effect on the aerodynamics of flight should be predictable. The rhombic airfoil is a good predictor in this respect. Expansion waves are only generated at the tips of the suction and pressure sides, and λ-shock waves are generated at the trailing edge of the airfoil. Of course, this profile is not suitable for low subsonic velocities, so various compromises of profile shapes are found depending on the velocities for which they are primarily intended, see Figure 894.
– 894: –
Profile types suitable for high speeds in compressible flow
Profile types suitable for high speeds in compressible flow
(a) transonic airfoil; (b) supersonic (lenticular shape); (c) supersonic (rhombic shape); (d) supersonic (trapezoidal shape); (e) hypersonic.
  ~  
Changes in values of aerodynamic parameters of airfoils at high flow speeds
To convert aerodynamic quantities obtained from measurements in incompressible flow to a compressible flow situation, the Glauert-Prandtl rule can be used, see Equation 906. These equations are valid only up to critical Mach or Reynolds numbers [Abbott and Doenhoff, 1959, p. 256 and pp. 283-287], [Hošek, 1949, p. 52]. Profiles with flows below the critical Reynolds number are termed laminar profiles. These equations align with experimental measurements.
– 906: –
Glauert-Prandtl rule
Glauert-Prandtl rule
(a) Glauert-Prandtl rule for pressure coefficient; (b) Glauert-Prandtl rule for lift coefficient; (c) effect of increasing velocity on drag coefficient. CD [1] drag coefficient of airfoil; CL [1] lift coefficient of airfoil; M [Mach] Mach number (before airfoil); CP [1] pressure coefficient of airfoil. The index i indicates incompressible flow, the index c compressible flow. The derivation is shown in [Hošek, 1949, p. 49].
MACH NUMBER AND HIGH VELOCITY FLOW EFFECTS
page 3.16
Changes in values of lift coefficient
The Glauert-Prandtl rule is used from roughly Mach 0,3, and its accuracy decreases near the speed of sound, as the calculation results go to infinity, see Figure 893, in contrast to the measured values (see measurements in [Hošek, 1949, p. 345]).
– 893: –
Changes in lift coefficient for rhombic airfoil
Changes in lift coefficient for rhombic airfoil
Changes in lift coefficient for rhombic airfoil: i [°] angle of attack.
Changes in values of drag coefficient
The change in the CD drag coefficient occurs only at transonic velocities, when λ-shock waves are generated. After leaving the transonic region, when oblique shock waves are generated, the drag coefficient decreases again, as shown in the example of flow around the Shuttle fuselage in Figure 897, p. 3.15.
Changes in values of angle of attack
The Glauert-Prandtl rule can also be used in reverse - it is possible to determine how the dimensions of the airfoil and its angle of attack should change at high speeds in order to have the same aerodynamic properties as at low speeds, see Equation 907. It is evident from the above that thin airfoils are sufficient for higher speeds, as anyone will notice in supersonic fighter aircraft, which are slimmer than subsonic machines.
– 907: –
Practical uses of Glauert-Prandtl rule
Practical application of Glauert-Prandtl rule
(a) airfoil in incompressible flow; (b) airfoil in compressible flow. x [m] airfoil coordinates in direction of inflow velocity; yi, c [m] airfoil thickness.
Changes in values of point of lift
High velocities also cause a shift of the center of lift, which shifts with a change in Mach number [Hošek, 1949, p. 46, 240], and the magnitude of the lift changes simultaneously, see Figure 893. For this reason, modern airplanes are equipped with devices to change the geometry of the wing or shift the center of gravity, and especially at speeds around the speed of sound, they change the angle of attack to maintain the lift at the required magnitude - at very high subsonic speeds it can even be negative [Stever and Haggerty, 1966, Flight, p. 69].
MACH NUMBER AND HIGH VELOCITY FLOW EFFECTS
page 3.17

Aerodynamics of profile cascades in compressible flow

Compressible flow effects at high velocity also manifest in profile cascade, which has an impact on the resulting velocity triangles of turbomachines. The formation of these effects can be predicted by both numerical and analytical methods. However, there are supersonic wind tunnels with profile casacdes for measuring aerodynamic quantities and visualizing supersonic flow.

Visualization of supersonic flow in profiled cascade
Figure 636 shows an interferogram (photograph showing the changes in gas density) of supersonic flow through a turbine profile cascade, with inlet velocity at Mach 1,19 and outlet velocity at Mach 2,003 in isentropic flow. Supersonic flow at the inlet generates oblique shock waves at the leading edges of the profiles. Visible are expansion waves around the cascade outlet and shock waves forming at the trailing edge where two supersonic flows meet.
– 636: –
Supersonic flow in blade cascade
left-scheme of situation recorded on interferogram; right-interferogram of supersonic flow through turbine profile cascade. Taken with Mach-Zehnder interferometer. Taken and images provided by Aerodynamic Laboratory in Nový Knín at Institute of Thermomechanics of AVČR, v.v.i.
Calculations of supersonic flow in profile cascades
A closed-form analytical solution can be found for compressible flow in the profile cascade only for the case of one-dimensional compressible flow in the channel - this is equivalent to the analytical solution of nozzles or diffusers. More accurate results that take into account the spatial nature of the flow can be achieved by numerical modelling using powerful computational hardware and appropriate software, see Figure 635, p. 3.18.
MACH NUMBER AND HIGH VELOCITY FLOW EFFECTS
page 3.18
– 635: –
Examples of numerical modelling of compressible flow in blade cascade
Examples of numerical modelling of compressible flow in blade cascade
(a) water vapour M1=0,42 (in front of cascade), M2=0,7 (behind cascade), created at the Energy Institute of Brno University of Technology; (b) turbine blade cascade, working gas air [Tajč et al., 2007]. M [Mach]; ρ [kg-m-3] density.
Problem of increasing profile deviation angle
When passing through expansion waves, the flow direction changes according to the Prandtl-Meyer function, respectively the deviation angle of the profile increases. Moreover, this angle changes significantly with changes in velocity.

References

ŠKORPÍK, Jiří, 2022, Essential equations of turbomachines, turbomachinery.education, Brno, https://turbomachinery.education/essential-equations-of-turbomachines.html.
ŠKORPÍK, Jiří, 2023, Technická matematika, engineering-sciences.education, Brno, https://engineering-sciences.education/technicka-matematika.html.
ŠKORPÍK, Jiří, 2024, Technická termomechanika, engineering-sciences.education, Brno, https://engineering-sciences.education/technicka-termomechanika.html.
ABBOTT, Ira, DOENHOFF, Albert, 1959, Theory of wing sections, including a summary of airfoil data, Dover publications, inc., New York, ISBN-10:0-486-60586-8.
ANON., 2010, Expansion fan – Isentropic flow, National Aeronautics and Space Administration – NASA, Washington, D.C., http://www.grc.nasa.gov.
DEJČ, Michail, 1967, Technická dynamika plynů, SNTL, Praha.
HLOUŠEK, Jiří, 1992, Termomechanika, VUT v Brně, Brno, ISBN 80-214-0387-X.
HOŠEK, Josef, 1949, Aerodynamika vysokých rychlostí, Naše vojsko, Praha.
HOŠEK, Josef, 1962, Dnešní letectví: nové vývojové směry v letectví, Práce, Praha
KADRNOŽKA, Jaroslav, 2004, Tepelné turbíny a turbokompresory, Akademické nakladatelství CERM, s.r.o., Brno, ISBN 80–7204–346–3.
KNEUBUEHL, Beat, 2004, Balistika střely, přesnost střelby, účinek, Naše vojsko, Praha, ISBN 80-206-0749-8.
MACUR, Milan, 2010, Úvod do analytické mechaniky a mechaniky kontinua, Vutium, Brno, ISBN 978-80-214-3944-3.
O’FARRELL, J.M., RIECKHOFF, T.J., 2011, Direct Visualization of Shock Waves in Supersonic Space Shuttle Flight, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, AL 35812 – Technical Memorandum.
STEVER, Guyford, HAGGERTY James, 1966, Flight, Time Inc.
TAJČ, Ladislav, BEDNÁŘ, Lukáš, POLANSKÝ, Jiři, Šťastný, Miroslav, 2007, Radial Control Stage with Partial Steam Admission, Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Experimental and Computational Aerothermodynamics of Internal Flows, Lyon.
MARBONA, Himpu, RODRÍGUEZ, Daniel, MARTÍNEZ-CAVA AGUILAR, Alejandro, VALERO RAY VANDENHOECK, Eusebio, PURI, Kunal, PANIAGUA, Guillermo, 2026, Large-Eddy Simulations of A Turbulent Boundary Layer Separation Over a Bump With Strong Pressure Gradients and Free-Stream Turbulence, Journal of Fluids Engineering, ASME, New York, ISSN 0098-2202, doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4071255.
©Jiří Škorpík, LICENCE